Author Topic: Rare 9-0 SCOTUS ruling: Electors are not free agents.  (Read 218 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pdunn

Rare 9-0 SCOTUS ruling: Electors are not free agents.
« on: July 06, 2020, 12:40:47 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Chiafalo et al. v. Washington

    https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/19pdf/19-465_i425.pdf

    Good ruling.  States can sanction or remove "faithless electors."  The electors HAVE to vote as their state voted.

    Kagan wrote the opinion.  Unanimous vote with a couple of concurring opinions.  It gives me some confidence that some things in our Constitution are not going to be swept under the rug or grossly misinterpreted because of political whims.
    "On rainy days, the early justices would enliven case conferences with wine. On other days, even if the sun was shining, Chief Justice John Marshall would order wine anyway, saying, 'Our jurisdiction is so vast that it must be raining somewhere.' "
     
    The following users thanked this post: ed swain, The E-Man

    HerdFans.com

    Rare 9-0 SCOTUS ruling: Electors are not free agents.
    « on: July 06, 2020, 12:40:47 PM »

    Offline Taft#1

    Re: Rare 9-0 SCOTUS ruling: Electors are not free agents.
    « Reply #1 on: July 06, 2020, 02:11:22 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Great and right decision . I was worried the lib judges would give the Ds a glimmer of hope about the popular vote
     

    Offline herdorbust

    Re: Rare 9-0 SCOTUS ruling: Electors are not free agents.
    « Reply #2 on: July 06, 2020, 09:34:50 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • The communist party lost this time thank God!!!
     

    Offline pdunn

    Re: Rare 9-0 SCOTUS ruling: Electors are not free agents.
    « Reply #3 on: July 06, 2020, 10:34:38 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0


  • Article II Section 1 of the Constitution:

    Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

    Bet you didn't know you didn't have a right under the US Constitution to vote for president, or more specifically for electors, did you?  That comes down from your state.
    "On rainy days, the early justices would enliven case conferences with wine. On other days, even if the sun was shining, Chief Justice John Marshall would order wine anyway, saying, 'Our jurisdiction is so vast that it must be raining somewhere.' "
     
    The following users thanked this post: The E-Man

    HerdFans.com

    Re: Rare 9-0 SCOTUS ruling: Electors are not free agents.
    « Reply #3 on: July 06, 2020, 10:34:38 PM »