Topic: This years team the deepest under Huff

[parshall2marshall]

Thats a huge reach

It wasn't a "reach" at all. They were facts. Why can't you just make a more apropos observation like HerdEcon made, stating it matters critically how good the 1's are when comparing the 2's. Which, in my estimation we have been burned on in the past in predicting how much talent and ability would show forth. Or a nice way of saying our 1's later proved to be not very good, going on internal unit vs. unit.

[elginherd]

It wasn't a "reach" at all. They were facts. Why can't you just make a more apropos observation like HerdEcon made, stating it matters critically how good the 1's are when comparing the 2's. Which, in my estimation we have been burned on in the past in predicting how much talent and ability would show forth. Or a nice way of saying our 1's later proved to be not very good, going on internal unit vs. unit.

Well said.
2's and 1's being almost equivalent could be a great thing, but it's more than likely an indictment of the 1's.