Sometimes I wonder if the main goal of our offense is how quickly in a possession we can get off a shot, using as little of the shot clock as possible. Seems like too often there is no differentiation between "a shot" and "a GOOD shot". Danny has stated more than once that anyone on the squad who feels comfortable with a 3 point shot, he wants them to take it; NOT think about taking it, just take it!! Well, until we become a team that averages around 40 per cent or better from 3 point land game after game, not sure this is the best philosophy. As a team, not sure we've ever been among the leaders every season when it comes to 3 point shooting per centage. Becomes a problem when we are really cold, like at Maryland, and coupled with our lack of emphasis on rebounding, can really snow ball when up against a strong foe having a hot night offensively.
Last night, was a back and forth game early, Maryland took a one point lead, around 26-25 or thereabouts. D'Antoni put in a couple of subs, one of whom was Byers. Wasn't in the game but a few seconds, Steve Cotton stated Byers fires a three, "air ball". Maryland converted on other end, their lead began to stretch out, and we never led again, IIRC.
Our offensively philosophy serves well when we have a talent edge, or a significant edge. When talent is pretty equal, or we are on the short end, game will be close on the average, like Hofstra, or we will, on the whole, be in trouble, like Maryland.