Author Topic: AAC now looking at UTSA  (Read 940 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NewfieHerdFan

AAC now looking at UTSA
« on: September 21, 2021, 02:19:27 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  •  
    The following users thanked this post: mr_ash_1995

    HerdFans.com

    AAC now looking at UTSA
    « on: September 21, 2021, 02:19:27 PM »

    Online svherd

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #1 on: September 21, 2021, 02:23:58 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0


  • Herd Rises
    Vision Campaign
    MU Foundation
     

    Offline Big City

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #2 on: September 21, 2021, 02:42:42 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Are they looking at ?potential? now?
    IronMan & Multisport Athlete
    2 x American Triple T Finisher
    Celebrated beer drinker
     
    The following users thanked this post: MUinDE, The E-Man, HoPPy785

    Offline Thundering In MD

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #3 on: September 21, 2021, 02:46:04 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • The AAC moved  its office to Dallas for a reason.
    Twitter:  @ThunderingInMD

     
    The following users thanked this post: parshall2marshall, HoPPy785

    Offline HoPPy785

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #4 on: September 21, 2021, 02:49:07 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • I'm not saying Sun Belt is perfect by any stretch, but count me out of that. Colorado State, Air Force, UAB, UTSA/Rice/Army. I care about as much about those schools as I do Tulane, Tulsa, and SMU.

    Sun Belt should get aggressive and grab as many quality, fan supported, schools they can. Kill CUSA and put a big gap between Sun Belt and MAC. Give 10yrs, Sun Belt might have a better rep than AAC.
     
    The following users thanked this post: Garbanjo, forphase1, Herd 90, SuperAnjario

    Offline HoPPy785

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #5 on: September 21, 2021, 02:52:26 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Are they looking at ?potential? now?

    I think they're doing a good job of getting programs to prop up tv viewership (probably their main goal). I think they're doing a poor job of getting programs to prop up perception of their product.
     

    Offline puma

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #6 on: September 21, 2021, 03:31:59 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • I'm not saying Sun Belt is perfect by any stretch, but count me out of that. Colorado State, Air Force, UAB, UTSA/Rice/Army. I care about as much about those schools as I do Tulane, Tulsa, and SMU.

    Sun Belt should get aggressive and grab as many quality, fan supported, schools they can. Kill CUSA and put a big gap between Sun Belt and MAC. Give 10yrs, Sun Belt might have a better rep than AAC.

    I'm right there with you. Some of the names being thrown around have zero appeal. I don't think it will even take 10 years for the Sun Belt to overtake the AAC in football. If Boise winds up in the Big 12, it might even overtake the MWC in the process. It's like the AAC didn't learn anything from what happened to C-USA the last go-around.

    It's definitely a long shot but if the AAC and MWC partition the Texas C-USA schools and the East is left unscathed, it might be left in a better position because of all of this. That's assuming there are no defections to the Sun Belt. If there are, we definitely don't want to be stuck here.
     
    The following users thanked this post: HoPPy785

    Offline herdfan129

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #7 on: September 21, 2021, 04:24:57 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Agreed. I want nothing to do with the AAC at this point. If we weren't getting invited, this is the route I was hoping they would take. This will be the most parity ever among the G5 conferences.
    The right way is always the right way- Coach Huff

    2020 National Soccer Champs!
     
    The following users thanked this post: HoPPy785

    Online Garbanjo

    • Benefactors of HerdFans
    • Assistant Coach
    • *
    • Posts: 8876
    • Thanked: 7682 times
    • Marco's Den Member Since 02/2009
    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #8 on: September 21, 2021, 04:36:48 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  •  
    The following users thanked this post: Big City

    Offline DJdaHERDfan

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #9 on: September 21, 2021, 06:07:51 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • I?ve told y?all all along it will be UTSA / FAU / UAB and Army if they decide to join
    IT'S TAILGATING SEASON!
     

    Offline banker

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #10 on: September 21, 2021, 06:12:59 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • It must be their 4,000 seat basketball arena that typically hosts as many as 500 fans that is attracting the AAC.
     
    The following users thanked this post: Big City, parshall2marshall, svherd, whf, Johns1124

    Offline coalherd

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #11 on: September 21, 2021, 06:30:17 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • It must be their 4,000 seat basketball arena that typically hosts as many as 500 fans that is attracting the AAC.


    Naw, banker, its OBVIOUSLY how the 65,000 seat or so Alamo Dome looks, sounds, and projects a successful and positive image nationally on TV during football season when that throng of 5000 to 7000 UTSA fans goes into a frenzy during a UTSA home game!!
     

    HerdFans.com

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #11 on: September 21, 2021, 06:30:17 PM »

    Offline forphase1

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #12 on: September 21, 2021, 09:51:15 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Heck if we can get AAC/MWC to take the crappy western teams, that's a win for CUSA.  Granted I hope we go to Sun Belt, but if we don't for some reason losing Rice, UTSA, NTX, and UTEP is a huge win. 


    Let's Go Herd! 

    Final Rankings: 1999 - #10 (AP & ESPN), #12 (BCS); 2001 - #21 (ESPN); 2002 - #24 (AP), #19 (ESPN), 2014 - #22 (coaches), #23 (AP)

    Championships: 1925 WVIAC, 1928 WVIAC, 1931 WVIAC, 1937 Buckeye Conference, 1988 Southern Conference, 1992 I-AA, 1994 Southern Conference, 1996 Southern Conference, 1996 I-AA (15-0), 1997 MAC, 1998 MAC, 1998 Motor City, 1999 MAC (13-0), 1999 Motor City, 2000 MAC, 2000 Motor City, 2001 GMAC, 2002 MAC, 2002 GMAC, 2009 Pizza Bowl, 2011 Beef O Brady Bowl, 2013 Military Bowl, 2014 Boca Raton Bowl, 2015 St. Petersburg Bowl, 2017 New Mexico Bowl, 2018 Gasparilla Bowl.
     
    The following users thanked this post: herdorbust, herdfan129

    Offline MUther

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #13 on: September 22, 2021, 06:28:23 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Heck if we can get AAC/MWC to take the crappy western teams, that's a win for CUSA.  Granted I hope we go to Sun Belt, but if we don't for some reason losing Rice, UTSA, NTX, and UTEP is a huge win.

    They should move the CUSA office east and just not tell anyone there that it isn't functional anymore.  See how long it takes them to notice that they haven't gotten paid and Judy's name is no longer on the account.  Ghosted. 
     
    The following users thanked this post: forphase1

    Online Garbanjo

    • Benefactors of HerdFans
    • Assistant Coach
    • *
    • Posts: 8876
    • Thanked: 7682 times
    • Marco's Den Member Since 02/2009
    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #14 on: September 22, 2021, 07:47:31 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Heck if we can get AAC/MWC to take the crappy western teams, that's a win for CUSA.  Granted I hope we go to Sun Belt, but if we don't for some reason losing Rice, UTSA, NTX, and UTEP is a huge win.

    That would be nice haha

    Then take the best Sunbelt teams

    Oh well pipedream???

     
    The following users thanked this post: forphase1

    Offline THECHAMPISHERE

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #15 on: September 22, 2021, 11:45:53 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]2
  • Memphis sucked for literally 10 years while in CUSA. As soon (it only took until year two) they went to the AAC they started winning 8 games a year (they've been at 8 or better for 7 straight years) and now everyone on here thinks they will be the next Big 12 pick up.

    UTSA, FAU, UAB and who ever else the AAC selects will be better than anything left in CUSA or the Sun Belt after a few years.

    Let's be honest, most people on here bashing the AAC and fawning over the Sun Belt are only doing so because they know our chances of going to the AAC at this point are slim to none. It's like when the hottest girl in school turns you down, you say, we'll she wasn't all that pretty anyway.

    Everyone keeps saying they wouldn't be interested in what's left in the AAC; well Temple, ECU, SMU, Memphis, Tulsa, South Florida, and if added UTSA, FAU, and UAB would ALL be top 3 teams in either CUSA or the Sun Belt. You all realize every single remaining member (outside of ECU) of the AAC, even Navy, has been in the top 25 in the last 5 years? ECU would run through CUSA and be the 2nd or 3rd best team in the Sun Belt.
    « Last Edit: September 22, 2021, 12:01:18 PM by THECHAMPISHERE »
     
    The following users thanked this post: Herdmeister, miltonherdfan

    Offline GreenWhite

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #16 on: September 22, 2021, 12:05:33 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • The AAC can have UTSA.

    I wouldn't mind being in the AAC. The main thing I am seeing is that the G5 is going to be a lot of rag tags that will not be interesting. No matter which conference we end up in, it is not going to be great. The only thing I applaud the Sun Belt on is that they are forward thinking. How forward thinking will the AAC be if they lose two more teams? Looking at UTSA tells me a lot. All of this conference shuffling is making my head spin a little bit. Since I can really do nothing about it except discuss it with people, I try to not think too much about it.
     

    Offline Luke80

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #17 on: September 22, 2021, 12:22:59 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Not sure your point makes much sense. Moving to the AAC did not really help ECU's football performance. Last weekend notwithstanding. They have not had a winning season since 2014, their first year in the AAC.

    We need to focus on who are conference mates will be and not on the conference name.  All the TV contracts will end up being renegotiated.
     

    Offline herdfan129

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #18 on: September 22, 2021, 12:58:47 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Memphis sucked for literally 10 years while in CUSA. As soon (it only took until year two) they went to the AAC they started winning 8 games a year (they've been at 8 or better for 7 straight years) and now everyone on here thinks they will be the next Big 12 pick up.

    UTSA, FAU, UAB and who ever else the AAC selects will be better than anything left in CUSA or the Sun Belt after a few years.

    Let's be honest, most people on here bashing the AAC and fawning over the Sun Belt are only doing so because they know our chances of going to the AAC at this point are slim to none. It's like when the hottest girl in school turns you down, you say, we'll she wasn't all that pretty anyway.

    Everyone keeps saying they wouldn't be interested in what's left in the AAC; well Temple, ECU, SMU, Memphis, Tulsa, South Florida, and if added UTSA, FAU, and UAB would ALL be top 3 teams in either CUSA or the Sun Belt. You all realize every single remaining member (outside of ECU) of the AAC, even Navy, has been in the top 25 in the last 5 years? ECU would run through CUSA and be the 2nd or 3rd best team in the Sun Belt.


    Not for me. I wanted the AAC when I thought they were going to add the top and best football programs. App St, UAB type of teams. Now that it's obvious they are chasing markets and expanding even further West, I have no desire to be in that conference.

    If we could get this regional G5 conference formed then we would have a better conference imo.

    The right way is always the right way- Coach Huff

    2020 National Soccer Champs!
     
    The following users thanked this post: HoPPy785

    Online Flat Tire 2

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #19 on: September 22, 2021, 01:07:09 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • https://twitter.com/nikgazcs/status/1439997176751529990?s=21

    My guess is that Boise and SDSU said no thanks. That has got to hurt the perception of the AAC. Sooner or later, the AAC is going to run out of schools to invite.
    « Last Edit: September 22, 2021, 01:10:10 PM by Flat Tire 2 »
     
    The following users thanked this post: svherd

    Offline Herdmeister

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #20 on: September 23, 2021, 07:45:37 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Memphis sucked for literally 10 years while in CUSA. As soon (it only took until year two) they went to the AAC they started winning 8 games a year (they've been at 8 or better for 7 straight years) and now everyone on here thinks they will be the next Big 12 pick up.

    UTSA, FAU, UAB and who ever else the AAC selects will be better than anything left in CUSA or the Sun Belt after a few years.

    Let's be honest, most people on here bashing the AAC and fawning over the Sun Belt are only doing so because they know our chances of going to the AAC at this point are slim to none. It's like when the hottest girl in school turns you down, you say, we'll she wasn't all that pretty anyway.

    Everyone keeps saying they wouldn't be interested in what's left in the AAC; well Temple, ECU, SMU, Memphis, Tulsa, South Florida, and if added UTSA, FAU, and UAB would ALL be top 3 teams in either CUSA or the Sun Belt. You all realize every single remaining member (outside of ECU) of the AAC, even Navy, has been in the top 25 in the last 5 years? ECU would run through CUSA and be the 2nd or 3rd best team in the Sun Belt.

    Champ, it is often hard for me to agree with you but on this one you are dead on
    Today, I consider myself, the luckiest man on the face of the earth..
                   ----Lou Gehrig

     

    Offline HoPPy785

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #21 on: September 23, 2021, 09:28:18 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Memphis sucked for literally 10 years while in CUSA. As soon (it only took until year two) they went to the AAC they started winning 8 games a year (they've been at 8 or better for 7 straight years) and now everyone on here thinks they will be the next Big 12 pick up.

    UTSA, FAU, UAB and who ever else the AAC selects will be better than anything left in CUSA or the Sun Belt after a few years.

    Let's be honest, most people on here bashing the AAC and fawning over the Sun Belt are only doing so because they know our chances of going to the AAC at this point are slim to none. It's like when the hottest girl in school turns you down, you say, we'll she wasn't all that pretty anyway.

    Everyone keeps saying they wouldn't be interested in what's left in the AAC; well Temple, ECU, SMU, Memphis, Tulsa, South Florida, and if added UTSA, FAU, and UAB would ALL be top 3 teams in either CUSA or the Sun Belt. You all realize every single remaining member (outside of ECU) of the AAC, even Navy, has been in the top 25 in the last 5 years? ECU would run through CUSA and be the 2nd or 3rd best team in the Sun Belt.

    I agree and disagree with this. I've been a firm believer that AAC's P6 campaign and ESPN backing actually did a lot for their perception (although some poked fun). I believe AAC has been weaker on the field than advertised. Their top team or two each year are legit but I think the top middle to bottom of the pack were no better than any other mildly successful G5. They just got a boost due to the perception they worked hard to build.

    Like Herdfan129 said, I really wanted AAC until I saw them going West. I'd still take AAC over anything else, but I won't be disappointed if we don't go. I would have been very disappointed if they went with the best in the East and we missed out. Now I'm feeling ok with the backup plan. I don't believe the proposed new AAC will have a single program (once Memphis is gone) that can fill the void left behind by the other teams. The perception will slowly waiver and they will be on MWC level or lower. They won't be the guaranteed playoff contender producer in 5 years.
     

    HerdFans.com

    Re: AAC now looking at UTSA
    « Reply #21 on: September 23, 2021, 09:28:18 AM »