0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
From the NCAA Men's Soccer Championships manual...====================================Section 2.4 Selection Criteria The following criteria shall be employed by a governing sports committee in selecting participants for NCAA championships competition:● Won-lost record;● Strength of schedule; and● Eligibility and availability of student-athletes for NCAA championships.In addition to Bylaw 31.3.3, the Men's Soccer Committee shall consider the following criteria in the selection of at-large teams for the men's soccer championship (not necessarily in priority order):● Adjusted Rating Percentage Index (RPI), which includes:- Won-lost-tied record (25%).- Opponents' strength of schedule (50%).- Opponents' opponents' strength of schedule (25%).- Bonus/penalty system (see below).● Head-to-head competition.● Results versus common opponents.● Strength and results against nonconference opponents.● Results against teams already selected (including automatic qualifiers with an RPI of 1-75).● Late-season performance in last eight games (strength and results).● Strength and results against conference opponents.Recommendations provided by regional advisory committees also shall be considered by the Men's Soccer Committee. Coaches? polls and/or any other outside polls or rankings are not used as a criterion by the Men's Soccer Committee for selection purposes.========================================So even though we were Top 8 in the human polls, they are excluded as ranking criteria whereas RPI is specifically provided as one of the criteria. We were 17th in RPI last year. There are 4 regional advisory committees that provide input to the committee that can be considered. Charlotte's men's head coach is the C-USA rep on our regional advisory committee.