if there's been no significant benefit to realignments, then maybe it's trying to halt the perceived downward slide that we were on in CUSA, the loss of hope and the fear of being left behind. i sure hope we haven't "burned it down" for quick satisfaction, as the articles states, but instead, be one of the exceptions.
i do think that if we thrive in the SBC, it won't be because we'll save much money or those type things, but rather the chance for a new beginning and what i perceive as more "family" stability. i suspect most agree it wasn't the first choice- that we'd probably rather have a tight east/mid Atlantic/southeastern league, partly as a result of CUSA folding entirely and/or other moves.
people say this or that conference is going to be the best or the worst but for the major sports and some not so major sports like Women's BB, baseball, softball, i think the pecking order among the eastern G5 will remain the same for a while (slight fluctuations). but i've said it before- i hope and i think the SBC east, in the next few years, could be one of the best divisions in all of the G5. if that happens, then perhaps TV contract and other money will at least keep up with inflation.