Isn't it striking how often you find that a college or pro team has a head coach who made their name as an offensive or defensive coordinator, only to find that once that guy ascends to a head coach position, it's the opposite side of the ball that excels for his team?
Consider our own coach's defensive headaches in comparison to the offense... regardless of what you or I think of this play call or that, it's difficult to argue that ultimately if our defense could get off the field with any even average regularity, we'd be a far cry from 0-5 right now.
But now, think beyond that... Tony Dungy, esteemed for his great defensive mind, rides his offense to a Super Bowl title... the last NFC champ, Tampa Bay, was propelled by an outstanding defense, led by the supposed great offensive brain in Jon Gruden's head... the prior year, Brian Billick, the offensive genius formerly of Minnesota, took the title with a defense that some consider one of the best in NFL history... at the college level, if I'm not mistaken, Pete Carroll was a defensive mastermind, yet his USC offenses have been particularly potent...
You get the idea... it's not an "always" thing, but on the other hand, consider how rarely you find the exact opposite thing to be true -- ie, that a championship is won with the offensive genius riding a great offense and a substandard defense to a title.
Just interesting to me... possibly *just* me(?).