So everyone has said AT has missed this, missed that, wasn't here last year, and can't practice a full week...and you KNOW WHAT? EVERY - SINGLE - PRACTICE - REPORT where both AT and IG practice has either AT coming out way ahead or slightly ahead of IG...based on completions, turnovers, their overall performance, etc.
When the NFL scouts came out...they wanted to see a 70% AT throw to Brady...not a 100% IG throw to Brady. What does that say?
The big Dilemma the coaching staff seams to have right now...is that a 60-70% new to the program AT is better than a 100% IG that's been in the system for a year...if this is true...than we have to go with AT. When he can't play, IG will have to step in...maybe we, reluctantly, have somewhat of a 2 QB system this year resting AT certain games/quarters (which IMO would be a great way to break in IG slowly - which is what you want to do with new QB's).
So here's the deal...from what we know...either AT is the real deal...because he's out practicing IG at 60-70% or IG isn't ready yet...because he isn't practicing as good as the 60-70% healthy new guy (AT).
Usually, and coaches will tell you, what you do in practice translates to the games. So the better gamer at the moment looks like AT.
It's all about who gives us a better chance to win...and right now sadly, the injured guy who can only practice a few times a week...looks by all accounts at least slightly better than the healthy one. The big question is, what does that mean (see type in bold)?