Barring any major roster or coaching changes, it is shaping up to be a fairly competitive game next week! Home field advantage is making most of the computers lean toward Tech, of course.
Sagarin VT by 4.5
Massey MU (48%) 27 - 28 (52%) VT
0/3 Sims VT wins 5,794 of the simulations at an average score of 27-25. VT has a raw probability of 62%
ESPN FPI VT 69.8%
I'm approaching this like it is our bowl game. Right now, projections have us against Hawaii, Boise St. (unlikely), Wake Forest, and Appalachian State. Want bulletin board material? Most projections have VT in a bowl game too, which means they're assuming Tech will beat us. These projections say that is not a guarantee at all.
It may come down to individual matchups:
On paper, Michigan should have beaten OSU cleanly. The Buckeyes exploited Michigan's linebackers who couldn't keep up with OSU's receivers underneath. I speculated State's running game would make it or break it, but when you're getting 10-15 yards on rinky-dink crossing routes, you don't need a running game. What is the Achilles heel in Tech's lineup and schemes? That's the challenge the coaching staff faces.
I know a lot of you will say, "Whatever it is, Doc and his staff won't see it". Maybe, maybe not. You have to give the old fart credit for one thing, he gets the team ready for bowl games. I hope that is the approach he takes as well.
What name ideas do you have? _______ Bowl.
Post-script:
A Redditor created an impressive compilation of stats on Conference vs. Conference and G5 vs. P5 records. In particular:
G5 (WITHOUT WAC) vs. P5 (WITHOUT BIG EAST)
RECORD WIN PCT
ALL-TIME 418-1692-13 0.197
20 YR 312-1393 0.183
10 YR 175-828 0.174
5 YR 98-487 0.168
There is an apparent loss in parity over the years, although it isn't a statistically-significant one at this point (ignoring ties, Chi-Square p~0.22). I guess I have to take back what I said about the predictability of CFB in the P5/G5 era, seeing as it's pretty much always been that way. :-\