I posted this a few days ago on another site. I haven't been very active here, but this topic has drawn me in.
I've made it clear how I felt about Alex Mirabal. He was an excellent coach and a good person, and I'm glad my son had the opportunity to play for him. However, I was not in agreement with every decision he made. It's my opinion that two players didn't get fair deals while at Marshall: Alex Locklear and Nate Devers. It's not that I think either one of these players were leaps and bounds better than those ahead of them. Actually, I'm not even saying that they were better at all. But I was not comfortable with how they lost their positions in the depth chart.
During camp before the 2017 season, Lock had won one of the OT positions. Ulmer was second team behind him. It was only a week or so before the season when Lock was late (4-5 min) for a meeting. Mirabal demoted him on the spot. For the record, I don't have an issue with a coach being strict with his rules, and perhaps a loss of position was appropriate. The problem I have is that the switch was absolute. Ulmer got every first-team rep from that point on, and started and played every game from beginning to end. Was Ulmer a better OL than Locklear by the end of that year? Yes, and it would be surprising if he wasn't, given the enormous advantage he was awarded. This is not in any way meant to talk down about Ulmer. He did what he was supposed to and worked hard.
Nate Deavers and Jordan Dowrey were set to rotate each series in their first game as redshirt freshmen. Nate got the start (one of only two games Jordan didn't start in his career at Marshall). But Deavers had a few bad plays, got beat a few times with his pass-blocking. Jordan had a better game. Jordan played 2-1 on series in the second half, and won the starting position for the next game. Fair so far, perhaps. But then Mirabal switched Deavers to second-team center, behind Selby, and moved Cody Collins from backup C to backup OG. Nate Deavers went from starting and rotating with a fellow redshirt freshman, to backing up a JR OL who was never coming out of the game. That season, Jordan ruptured several discs in his lower back and eventually had to switch every-other series with Collins just to make it through games. That could have been - I say, should have been - Nate Deavers. The rest, for Nate, was just poor luck: a criminal charge (that was later dismissed) that forced him to miss much of his junior season, and a knee injury that took him out of his senior year. Yes, Jordan became better OL than Nate. But again, that was a result of first-team reps and playing time. Nate's complete demotion never made sense. Like Locklear, it seemed too extreme and nonredeemable.
And no, I think PFF is a bit of a joke, especially for OL, where those grading don't know the reads, checks, or assignments. Ask any college coach what they think about the evaluation PFF gives their athletes. Ask the Marshall coaches. I doubt you can find many who would give them a passing grade.
I'm not saying either of these young men would have held onto starting positions throughout their careers. But I was never comfortable with how they lost their opportunities. And I totally understand why Alex Locklear may want to test his skills with a fresh start somewhere else.
Best of luck, Alex.
I, too, noticed a change in the atmosphere and culture in 2016. I have theories as to why but I'm sure Clint would know better than me. Clint Van Horn was a great player for Marshall, but an even better person. He is a leader by example, brimming with sincerity and integrity. I'm not sure I see everything the way he does, but I would never pretend to know more than him about what went down behind the scenes, and I would never argue with his unique POV.
I still feel a strong connection to Alex Mirabal. He impressed me so in those first few years. I don't know exactly what caused the shift, but as Clint lays out, there was a definite change going into the 2016 season. Nothing was ever the same after that. He lost trust in his leaders (Clint, Selby, Sweede, Dowrey). It was tough to watch, and even tougher to explain.