I could care less about streaming. No fan outside of a Marshall fan will scour the web looking for a Marshall streamed game. Now if we were on traditional TV, they may stop and watch while channel surfing. Streaming gets us nothing other than allowing our own fans a chance to watch. To think otherwise is delusional.
There are large differences in 'streaming'...
-There is facebook streaming, which you are correct, will not capture the casual football fan.
-There is ESPN+, that offers a smorgasbord of games, which will capture fans with a passing interest in seeing what a team is up to...
-And there is streaming (Sling, Hulu Live, Youtube Watch, etc) which offers the same channels as the cable or satellite as 'live tv'. Often these streams are delayed for 4 or 10 seconds behind the raw downlinks...BUT are often of higher picture quality than cable or Dish Network.
AFA 'traditional TV', the number of cable & satellite subscribers is shrinking while the rate of cord-cutting is accelerating. To be fair, a lot of cordcutters are forgoing any sort of 'live tv' in favor of Netflix, Amazon Prime, HBO, Hulu, etc. So right now & in the future, streaming is very important element in exposure. And judging by the number of rooftop antennas in and around Huntington, '96 is correct in his assertions about OTA coverage.