could be wrong, but what stood out to me was that UT moved really well, constant and consistently, moved their feet and the ball. quicker from standstill, from perimeter on O, creators of opportunity. they're not the biggest or tallest team, no super athletes, no super shooters, just dogged in their team approach. i felt like we were always playing from behind, even when leading on the scoreboard.
some critical areas that we'd been pretty good at prior to this game:
questionable *shot selection throughout. as pointed out, how can you not get to the foul line for an entire half? see *
rebounds: although it's always good when your guards are contributing on the boards, staying busy and being where they need to be. but should they be constantly be leading or at the top of that category even though we understand 'position-less BB', at least on the offensive end?
points off turnovers: simple outhustled, our transition game faltered. too many forced passes.
points in the paint and 2nd chance points: at least, give credit to Jannson for 5 blocked and altering more shots and 13 pts in 29 minutes.
bench points/any other significant contribution: really needed George and others even though we were close to having 6 score in double figures.
give credit to UT. a big part of the reason we didn't move, we didn't move the ball. we didn't create.
i think this one is on the coaches more than individual players. on to the next one (maybe Sunday replacement game?), hopefully having learned a thing or two.