Legg's success at Purdue highly challenges 88's comments about not being smart enough to handle the game execution play by play. By the way, most of this isn't minute by minute or play by play as 88 depicts, it is now programmed on worksheets; an if-then-else process that we see in OC and head coaches who call plays hands every week. Every result has a serious of options to react to it. And the choice is often based on the defensive alignment seen early in the set. I don't mean to be Captain Obvious here, just wanting to defray the concept that one makes up a response as the game goes on. If they try that, they lose.
I am not pulling for Bill Legg, never met him, don't know him other than to recognize him. But I do know he has been successful offensively at the highest collegiate levels and no matter what folks feel about him, they can't take that away or make it untrue.
Context my friend, context. This is exactly why most schools end up hiring the wrong guy. By looking at coaching bio's and selective stats without looking at overall picture. I never said, btw, Legg wasn't smart enough. I said he didn't have the right mind....ie not quick enough to process all the info and consistently put together a sound sequence of plays and adjust to defense.
Joe Tiller brought his imaginative offense to Purdue long before Legg arrived. And retired a year after Legg left.
Leggs biggest successes at Purdue were due to his QB Curtis Painter. Who, while not great, did play 4 seasons on NFL rosters. In 2006 Purdue did great against the weak competition but struggled mightily vs good competition (sound familiar?):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Purdue_Boilermakers_football_team.
In six losses they scored over 21 pts once. In 3 of those losses they score single digits twice and were shut out once. Their only "shootout" win in Big10 was at 2-10 Illinois.
In 2007 much of the same, beat up on bad teams cut couldn't beat the good ones. Win vs Notre Dame looks good on paper but Irish finished 3-9
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Purdue_Boilermakers_football_team.
He did so well at Purdue he ended up at FIU.
If you've never been involved in play calling you have no idea just how hard it is. That's not a slight to Legg. It's real hard. Flow charts don't tell you anything about creativity and imagination...let alone counter strategy. The good OC's can have 100+ plays on those sheets, manage it, and keep the defense guessing. Many more have much less on those sheets so as not to confuse themselves...which limits what the offense can do. Over time many OC's become very predictable and much easier to defend....unless they have superior talent.
My opinion is if they hire him as OC, you better hope that the QB is great. Honestly I can't believe Huff would do that as it could lead to career altering consequences. It would also tell me he has no idea what the right "questions" are.