Author Topic: NET rankings  (Read 875 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online herdorbust2

NET rankings
« on: January 08, 2023, 11:38:39 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • We are still #77 out of 363 schools. That puts us in the top 21% of all teams. The net takes into consideration schedule, efficiency, where you win, etc,,, so I think we are doing pretty good this year. All 4 losses were winnable and we beat ourselves. Bottom line we still have a good rating according to what the NCAA uses. And during the App St/ JMU game last night the announcers started talking about how good we were and a really fun brand of ball we play. They were very impressed with us.
     
    The following users thanked this post: W0lfman, Garbanjo, herdfan93, parshall2marshall, wlf, The E-Man, elginherd

    HerdFans.com

    NET rankings
    « on: January 08, 2023, 11:38:39 AM »

    Online Flat Tire 2

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #1 on: January 08, 2023, 12:40:27 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  •  FWIW: Pomeroy has MU at #80 and Sagarin has MU at #92. Net has JMU at #87; Toledo at #113; Akron at #132; Ohio U at #135; Miami of Ohio at #322  :o. Duquesne at #126 and Queens at #180. I didn't check the rest of our opponents, but it appears that JMU is the highest ranked team we have played. It appears that we luck out with the MAC teams since we didn't play Kent State #53. Chuggy Bear's team is ranked at #20.

    https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/rankings/net/
    « Last Edit: January 08, 2023, 12:42:53 PM by Flat Tire 2 »
     
    The following users thanked this post: Garbanjo, parshall2marshall, svherd, elginherd

    Online herdorbust2

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #2 on: January 08, 2023, 12:49:47 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • FWIW: Pomeroy has MU at #80 and Sagarin has MU at #92. Net has JMU at #87; Toledo at #113; Akron at #132; Ohio U at #135; Miami of Ohio at #322  :o. Duquesne at #126 and Queens at #180. I didn't check the rest of our opponents, but it appears that JMU is the highest ranked team we have played. It appears that we luck out with the MAC teams since we didn't play Kent State #53. Chuggy Bear's team is ranked at #20

    All I know is the NET ranking the the NCAA uses has us as one of the top 21% of teams in basketball. I'll take it. And chuggy Bear is looking at a bunch of losses the rest of the season. He is a good coach back in the day but can't keep up with recruiting and offenses have passed him by. He keeps trying to retool his roster every year and it's not working. WV is out of their league in the Big 12. And I couldn't be happier. 2018-2019 WV was 15-21. Last year 16-17. And will be lucky to be .500 at the end of this year.
     

    Online Flat Tire 2

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #3 on: January 08, 2023, 01:07:21 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • FWIW: I went and checked out the rest of the schedule: Net rankings; Tenn Tech #306; Coppin State #277; Chicago State #294; Morehead State #282; Robert Morris #246; CCU #248; GA Southern #209'; UNCG #144. Southern Miss is currently #65.
     
    The following users thanked this post: svherd

    Online elginherd

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #4 on: January 08, 2023, 04:25:24 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • All I know is the NET ranking the the NCAA uses has us as one of the top 21% of teams in basketball. I'll take it. And chuggy Bear is looking at a bunch of losses the rest of the season. He is a good coach back in the day but can't keep up with recruiting and offenses have passed him by. He keeps trying to retool his roster every year and it's not working. WV is out of their league in the Big 12. And I couldn't be happier. 2018-2019 WV was 15-21. Last year 16-17. And will be lucky to be .500 at the end of this year.

    Huggins is essentially a disciple of Joe B Hall's philosophy of fouling so much that the refs stop blowing their whistles.

    Huggins needs a CPAP machine while he's awake.
    In memory of Dr Daniel P Babb who taught so much to so many.
     
    The following users thanked this post: 2xBison, pembrook burrows III, herdorbust2

    Offline IM4DHERD

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #5 on: January 08, 2023, 07:06:29 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Current NET rankings for Sunbelt teams (1/8/23 7:05PM)

    65   Southern Miss.   
    77   Marshall   
    87   James Madison   
    106   Louisiana   
    118   Troy   
    138   Old Dominion
    195   Texas St.
    204   South Alabama
    209   Ga. Southern
    217   App State
    248   Coastal Carolina
    265   Georgia St.
    303   Arkansas St.
    308   ULM   
    Make a difference...Join the Big Green

     
    The following users thanked this post: Garbanjo

    Online herdorbust2

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #6 on: January 08, 2023, 07:54:42 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Current NET rankings for Sunbelt teams (1/8/23 7:05PM)

    65   Southern Miss.   
    77   Marshall   
    87   James Madison   
    106   Louisiana   
    118   Troy   
    138   Old Dominion
    195   Texas St.
    204   South Alabama
    209   Ga. Southern
    217   App State
    248   Coastal Carolina
    265   Georgia St.
    303   Arkansas St.
    308   ULM

    Top 2 teams go at it in the cam Thursday night.
     
    The following users thanked this post: Garbanjo, coalherd

    Offline coalherd

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #7 on: January 08, 2023, 08:28:13 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Top 2 teams go at it in the cam Thursday night.

    To maintain or enhance our NET standing, we certainly can't endure too many more losses this season to those folks around the 195 mark and lower!
     

    Offline coalherd

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #8 on: January 08, 2023, 08:31:47 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • All I know is the NET ranking the the NCAA uses has us as one of the top 21% of teams in basketball. I'll take it. And chuggy Bear is looking at a bunch of losses the rest of the season. He is a good coach back in the day but can't keep up with recruiting and offenses have passed him by. He keeps trying to retool his roster every year and it's not working. WV is out of their league in the Big 12. And I couldn't be happier. 2018-2019 WV was 15-21. Last year 16-17. And will be lucky to be .500 at the end of this year.

    And apparently, bust, his "fellow tool", Gordy Geek, and the other WVU hierarchy can't afford to buy Chuggins out!!  Breaks my heart!  ;D
     
    The following users thanked this post: Garbanjo

    Offline ru4mu2

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #9 on: January 09, 2023, 07:06:55 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Current NET rankings for Sunbelt teams (1/8/23 7:05PM)

    65   Southern Miss.   
    77   Marshall   
    87   James Madison   
    106   Louisiana   
    118   Troy   
    138   Old Dominion
    195   Texas St.
    204   South Alabama
    209   Ga. Southern
    217   App State
    248   Coastal Carolina
    265   Georgia St.
    303   Arkansas St.
    308   ULM
    for comparison, not much difference at all and we have more teams.....
     

    Online Flat Tire 2

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #10 on: January 09, 2023, 07:20:35 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • for comparison, not much difference at all and we have more teams.....

    Surprising Net rating of  FLA Atlantic #13 and North Texas #38. CUSA might be a two bid league this year?
     

    Offline ru4mu2

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #11 on: January 09, 2023, 07:25:20 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Surprising Net rating of  FLA Atlantic #13 and North Texas #38. CUSA might be a two bid league this year?
    Could, I guess.  But too many times I see the committee take a .500 or just above acc or b1g team instead.
     
    The following users thanked this post: mr_ash_1995, wlf

    HerdFans.com

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #11 on: January 09, 2023, 07:25:20 AM »

    Online Flat Tire 2

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #12 on: January 09, 2023, 07:31:16 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Could, I guess.  But too many times I see the committee take a .500 or just above acc or b1g team instead.

    I just looked at NTSU out of conference schedule and it is really weak, I doubt they would be an at large bid. Scheduling is important. I starting to doubt the NET rankings, but it is still early in the season.

    Nov 7, 2022    vs
    S. Nazarene
    W 53-47
       1-0
    Nov 13, 2022    @
    Saint Mary's
       L 63-33
       1-1
    Nov 19, 2022    vs
    Fresno St.
       W 61-52
       2-1
    Nov 22, 2022    vs
    Paul Quinn
       W 76-46
       3-1
    Nov 25, 2022    @
    San Jose St.
       W 69-54
       4-1
    Nov 26, 2022    @
    LBSU
       W 68-47
       5-1
    Nov 27, 2022    vs
    UNCW
       L 55-51
       5-2
    Dec 3, 2022    vs
    Neb.-Omaha
       W 75-45
       6-2
    Dec 6, 2022    @
    UT Arlington
       W 60-57
       7-2
    Dec 10, 2022    vs
    Grand Canyon
       W 60-58
       8-2
    Dec 17, 2022    @
    Massachusetts
       W 62-44
       9-2
    Dec 22, 2022    @
    UTSA
       W 78-54
       10-2
    Dec 29, 2022    vs
    FAU
       L 50-46
       10-3
    Dec 31, 2022    vs
    FIU
       W 72-57
       11-3
    Jan 5, 2023    @
    W. Kentucky
       W 70-66
       12-3
    Jan 7, 2023    @
    team logo
    Middle Tenn.
       W 56-51
       13-3
    Date    OPP
    https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/teams/NTEXAS/north-texas-mean-green/schedule/regular/
    « Last Edit: January 09, 2023, 08:06:06 AM by Flat Tire 2 »
     

    Offline Herdmeister

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #13 on: January 09, 2023, 08:07:33 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • I just looked at NTSU out of conference schedule and it is really weak, I doubt they would be an at large bid. Scheduling is important. I starting to doubt the NET rankings, but it is still early in the season.

    Nov 7, 2022    vs
    S. Nazarene
    W 53-47
       1-0
    Nov 13, 2022    @
    Saint Mary's
       L 63-33
       1-1
    Nov 19, 2022    vs
    Fresno St.
       W 61-52
       2-1
    Nov 22, 2022    vs
    Paul Quinn
       W 76-46
       3-1
    Nov 25, 2022    @
    San Jose St.
       W 69-54
       4-1
    Nov 26, 2022    @
    LBSU
       W 68-47
       5-1
    Nov 27, 2022    vs
    UNCW
       L 55-51
       5-2
    Dec 3, 2022    vs
    Neb.-Omaha
       W 75-45
       6-2
    Dec 6, 2022    @
    UT Arlington
       W 60-57
       7-2
    Dec 10, 2022    vs
    Grand Canyon
       W 60-58
       8-2
    Dec 17, 2022    @
    Massachusetts
       W 62-44
       9-2
    Dec 22, 2022    @
    UTSA
       W 78-54
       10-2
    Dec 29, 2022    vs
    FAU
       L 50-46
       10-3
    Dec 31, 2022    vs
    FIU
       W 72-57
       11-3
    Jan 5, 2023    @
    W. Kentucky
       W 70-66
       12-3
    Jan 7, 2023    @
    team logo
    Middle Tenn.
       W 56-51
       13-3
    Date    OPP
    https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/teams/NTEXAS/north-texas-mean-green/schedule/regular/

    I have only seen 1 UNT game and in that one they looked very good
    Today, I consider myself, the luckiest man on the face of the earth..
                   ----Lou Gehrig

     

    Online Flat Tire 2

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #14 on: January 09, 2023, 09:14:35 AM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • I have only seen 1 UNT game and in that one they looked very good

    I hope the game you watch wasn't NTSU against Paul Quinn. ;)
     

    Offline GreenWhite

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #15 on: January 09, 2023, 12:16:02 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Could, I guess.  But too many times I see the committee take a .500 or just above acc or b1g team instead.
    I've also seen them change the criteria after schedules have been made to keep the smaller schools out. Strength of schedule used to be the main criteria. Then it was RPI. Then it was Net and whatever else. Schools from SB, CUSA, MAC etc. will not get those multiuple bids.
     
    The following users thanked this post: mr_ash_1995, ru4mu2

    Online herd2win

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #16 on: January 09, 2023, 12:18:42 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Same as with CUSA, none of the ratings matter as we have not played or will play any team in the top 50.  We need to fix the defensive lapses and get hot tournament time and then get a good match up in the NCAA.
     
    The following users thanked this post: Garbanjo, svherd

    Offline wlf

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #17 on: January 09, 2023, 05:56:40 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • I've also seen them change the criteria after schedules have been made to keep the smaller schools out. Strength of schedule used to be the main criteria. Then it was RPI. Then it was Net and whatever else. Schools from SB, CUSA, MAC etc. will not get those multiuple bids.
    Then it's the "eye " test. Give me a break. When you make the rules you're hard to beat.
     
    The following users thanked this post: mr_ash_1995

    Online Luke80

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #18 on: January 09, 2023, 06:16:55 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Even if FAU wins out their NET ranking could drop because they won?t get the chance for a Quad 1 win.  The big conference teams win by playing each other.  FAU has been good, but they?re going to drop some road games.  It?s not out of the question for CUSA to get 2 bids, but it?s still unlikely.
     

    Offline coalherd

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #19 on: January 09, 2023, 08:45:03 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • I hope the game you watch wasn't NTSU against Paul Quinn. ;)

    Obviously, FT2, you HAVE NOT seen the Paul Quinn CHEERLEADERS this season!!  ;D  ;)
     

    Offline coalherd

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #20 on: January 09, 2023, 08:48:16 PM »
  • [Like]0
  • [Dislike]0
  • Then it's the "eye " test. Give me a break. When you make the rules you're hard to beat.

    When it comes to the NCAA tourney selection process and the so-called "eye" test, the key is:  whose eyes are doing the observing!!
     

    HerdFans.com

    Re: NET rankings
    « Reply #20 on: January 09, 2023, 08:48:16 PM »