Over mid way in his third season after 34 games Huff's win percentage is .588.
Doc Holliday 11 seasons, 139 games, .612 win percentage.
Mark Snyder 5 years, 60 games, .392 win percentage.
I'm not sure those are legit apple to apple comparisons. Snyder followed Pruett who admittedly let recruiting go downhill in his final years but still had a good core and winning culture but suffered NCAA sanctions. Holliday took on a rebuilding job after the Snyder years and NCAA sanctions which may have hurt his early win percentages. Huff took over after Holliday, didn't have to rebuild but simply improve. However, Huff seems to be fading as the Holliday recruits exit the program. More importantly Huff has advantages neither Snyder nor Holliday had... the transfer portal and NIL. Huff also got a 6th year of player eligibility due to the Covid year, another advantage.
I think the transfer portal and NIL has changed college football to a degree that comparisons prior those two things aren't really fair apples to apples comparisons.
The people that believe the Sub Belt is a huge step above the CUSA in competition level should be happy that Huff's win percentage hasn't dropped off much. I'm one of those people that believe there is a lot of parity between G5 conferences and not a huge difference in competition levels. One G5 conference may be better than another top to bottom but the top teams and middle teams are close. The lesser conferences may have more poor performing teams or the top teams may be a couple players shy of being on par with any other top G5 team.
Bottom line, I'm not happy with a .588 win percentage in year 3 even though we may be in a slightly better conference. Huff has advantages his two most recent predecessors didn't have namely, the transfer portal, NIL, and the Covid year. To me he is underperforming. Huff was not facing a rebuilding situation or NCAA sanctions he just needed to maintain the talent level he was given and make some improvement. Hopefully, Huff can turn it around this season.