Well said. In all fairness, those of have been critical of the coaching, me included, should be willing to give credit when due. The Wildcat, halfback passes, and. other offensive wrinkles were key in this game. Hopefully we will see more in the remaining two games.
I agree, the changes were paramount, and perhaps represent the concept of "change when change is necessary". No doubt they waited too long to modify what is done and who does it, but in all honesty, it must be very difficult to start a game with four of your back seven on defense being first year players, starting with the 6th game of the year.ach
I doubt there will be a coaching change for a couple reasons, here's mine"
1> The schedule, I think Spears takes a part of this years' result on himself due to the schedule change with NCST, and accepting the schedule within the conference. It was ridiculous, IMHO, to have one home game on a Thursday in a five week span. This shouldn't happen to any coach.
2> The budget, I'm expecting that the coaching choices has a lot to do with the budget choices. You can't hire highly experienced coaches on first year coaches salaries. We were fortunate with Guidry, he was in a rebounding condition and it paid off for him.
3> The third one does fall to Huff, his choice of building a team around the portal; not giving himself and his staff time to build a well-oiled machine with replacement parts. With so many injured players, the replacements were just plainly not prepared to perform at the level necessary to win against teams in the SBC. IMHO, this league is for real, really good coaches and really loaded with talented players. Huff's experience leaves him limited in terms of knowing how and when to adapt and adopt with the coaches he is competing against.
Home
Help
Members
View the memberlist
Search For Members
Login
Register