How do you figure? He didn?t have the option to leave yet, evidenced by the best offer was a job at a 1-11 program for less money than we payed Gibson?
What part of Huff not wanting to be at MU would you and some others not understand. Huff with another HC in waiting is a miserable idea that would never have worked. Huff always had it in his mind that he was too good for MU - that much is clear.
I wouldn't be surprised that MU continually tried to low-ball him on the $$ - perhaps in-part because they knew that Huff was gone at the first decent opportunity anyway. A coach just cannot keep making cringe-worthy statements to the press without drawing the ire of the administration. We simply cut our losses. The buyout demand was the final straw if I had to guess.
Huff did some good very things here as a HC in-training. Nice bond with players. Worked the somewhat / relatively new portal like a guru. Said the right things about MU traditions and the 75. Ran a clean program. Hit and missed on coordinators/coaches. Pretty bad game-day coach considering how long he has been in coaching. But, in the end, like BP once (in?)famously said, "It's just time.".
MU will be fine and Huff will be fine after this parting. No extra animosity or holding grudges is needed ... but the situation came to a head and MU identified a personality-wise antithesis of Huff and have rolled the dice with same. The MU administration cannot reasonably be found at fault in my not-so-humble estimation. IF we strung the Indy Bowl along for awhile there may have been a last-ditch hope that we could iron things out. MU could have certainly used to the money, but will take 1 share instead of two now. Cannot we just let this go and move on.