Herdfan 1999.... I was not discussing individual vs. collective rights. I was simply making a statement that it's time for a civil debate where all voices are heard to come to solution.
I'm not going to stoop to your level, Greg H, except to say that as someone who has a JD, I can assure you I've studied more constitutional law than you. Further, I do believe you need a better understanding of what the Constitution is and how it is used and (most importantly) that it is a living document which is constantly modified (interpreted) by judges all over the US. This is the very basis of how American law works. Legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin put it best: "the Constitution is a story being written collectively by each generation of judges. Each judge has a responsibility to respect the characters and plot left her by her predecessors, but brings the story up to date in terms of plot and character development."
And this is how we interpret the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments... freedom of speech, is constantly being extended to media types of which the Founders never dreamed of; why wouldn't we adapt the Second Amendment to changing circumstances the same way?
It may be important to note, that I have always been a supporter of individual gun rights and a proponent of the states rights to govern. However, with the societal changes we have seen in this country and the increase in these senseless killings, I believe it demands us to take a harder look at what can be done to ensure it never happens again.
I posted an article that simply asked that the 2 sides enter into a conversation that begins with - "no one wants these killing to occur, so how do we come together to solve the problem"?
I think the basic problem with these arguments is that the anti-gun lobby see's no positive use or benefit to the use of guns and so artificially ignores the needs of those that do have a legitimate use...similarly the pro-gun lobby, dresses their arguments up in philosophical rhetoric about personal freedom and defense against state tyranny. It would seem to me that we are actually weighing the risk of a certain number of gun related killings against the pleasure and enjoyment that many citizens get from marksmanship, hunting and other peaceful pursuits.
On balance, I would personally forego my few hours of target practice each year if it would bring back just one of those 20 kids.... But that's just me, one voice among millions that should be heard as this issue is discussed.