I personally feel (and have expressed it many times here) Crawford could have been a very good player. The way I see it, Curfman was the problem with our starting five. He always seemed to me as if he wanted to be the point guard (always dribble, dribble & did I say dribble, took too much time trying to find someone open, often had bad shooting days, had the ball stolen from him quite often, etc.). I feel if Connor could have been our true PG and Curfman replaced by Crawford in the lineup we would have been much better off. Curfman could have come off the bench when we needed a three really bad & sometimes substitute for Crawford. Fricks could sub for Voles (sp?) & Nutter sub for Connor. Hey, it's just my opinion ok?